{"id":44,"date":"2012-10-04T15:28:00","date_gmt":"2012-10-04T15:28:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.ethanlewis.org\/icarus\/2012\/10\/04\/notes-on-dr-strangelove\/"},"modified":"2019-04-01T10:39:26","modified_gmt":"2019-04-01T14:39:26","slug":"notes-on-dr-strangelove","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.ethanlewis.org\/icarus\/2012\/10\/04\/notes-on-dr-strangelove\/","title":{"rendered":"Notes on Dr. Strangelove"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"clear: both; text-align: center;\"><\/div>\n<div style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;\"><a style=\"clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;\" href=\"http:\/\/manvshorror.files.wordpress.com\/2012\/01\/drstrangelove-movieposter1.jpg\"><img fetchpriority=\"high\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/manvshorror.files.wordpress.com\/2012\/01\/drstrangelove-movieposter1.jpg\" width=\"219\" height=\"320\" border=\"0\" \/><\/a>On Thursday, October 4, 2012 I was the guest speaker at the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.wb.psu.edu\/Information\/32514.htm\">kickoff to a film discussion series<\/a> hosted by Penn State Wilkes-Barre at<a href=\"http:\/\/www.rctheatres.com\/loc_wilkesbarre.asp\"> Movies 14<\/a> in Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania. \u00a0The overall theme of the series is movies that have to do with the end of the world. \u00a0The first film chosen was <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Stanley_Kubrick\">Stanley Kubrick<\/a>&#8216;s <i><a href=\"http:\/\/www.imdb.com\/title\/tt0057012\/\">Dr. Strangelove: Or, How I Learned To Stop Worrying And \u00a0Love The Bomb<\/a><\/i>. \u00a0Since the film deals with the &#8220;Doomsday&#8221; scenario of World War III and (spoiler alert!) ends with a global nuclear holocaust, it is a fitting kick-off to the series.\u00a0<\/span><\/div>\n<div style=\"text-align: justify;\"><\/div>\n<div style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;\">My role was to share some thoughtful remarks about the movie and ask questions aimed at stimulating discussion among the 50 or so people in attendance. \u00a0The audience was made up of students from the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.wb.psu.edu\/\">local Penn State campus<\/a>, a local parochial school, and interested members of the community. \u00a0What follows is my introductory remarks, followed by some of the questions I asked.<\/span><\/div>\n<div style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;\">******************************************************************<\/span><\/div>\n<div style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<p><span style=\"font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;\">I have watched <i>Dr. Strangelove<\/i>\u00a0at least 20 times. \u00a0Growing up in the Philadelphia area, it was often shown on the <a href=\"http:\/\/meandyouandablognamedboo.blogspot.com\/2008\/04\/wkbs-tv-channel-48-philadelphia.html\">now-defunct Channel 48<\/a>. I have also<a href=\"http:\/\/ethanlewis.org\/20\/\"> taught the movie to my history classes<\/a> at <a href=\"http:\/\/www.wyomingseminary.org\/\">Wyoming Seminary College Preparatory School<\/a> in Kingston, Pennsylvania. \u00a0This film resonates with me on many levels, including:<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><span style=\"font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;\">\u00a0the setting of the U.S. Air Force of the 1960&#8217;s and the tensions of the Cold War<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span style=\"font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;\">the comedic stylings of Peter Sellers (who plays the roles of <a href=\"http:\/\/upload.wikimedia.org\/wikipedia\/commons\/7\/75\/Dr._Strangelove_-_Group_Captain_Lionel_Mandrake.png\">Group Captain Lionel Mandrake (RAF)<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/moviegoings.files.wordpress.com\/2009\/04\/bald.jpg\">President Merkin Muffley<\/a> and \u00a0nuclear scientist <a href=\"http:\/\/www.capitalnewyork.com\/files\/a-strangelove_0.jpg\">Dr. Strangelove<\/a>), George C. Scott, who plays the quintessential All-American boy grown up to be a Cold Warrior, <a href=\"http:\/\/media.screened.com\/uploads\/0\/4499\/266622-but_he_ll_see_the_big_board.jpg\">General Buck Turgidson<\/a>, and Slim Pickens, as rustic B-52 pilot <a href=\"http:\/\/www.tumblr.com\/tagged\/slim-pickens?before=1335544330\">Major &#8220;King&#8221; Kong<\/a><\/span><\/li>\n<li><span style=\"font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;\">the many lines of the script that I cannot get out of my head. \u00a0I think about this movie all the time, and I am glad to be able to talk about it with you tonight.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;\">When the movie premiered in 1964 (it&#8217;s original debut at Christmas 1963 was delayed after the murder of President Kennedy) my father was an Airman First Class stationed at a U.S. Air Force base in England. \u00a0As a child I always enjoyed playing with his old uniform, and seeing people on screen wearing those exact clothes was quite interesting; it made me empathize with the Air Force personnel in the film who die defending Burpleson Air Force Base from the Army. \u00a0<\/span><\/div>\n<div style=\"text-align: justify;\"><\/div>\n<div style=\"clear: both; text-align: center;\"><span style=\"font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;\"><a style=\"clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;\" href=\"http:\/\/25.media.tumblr.com\/tumblr_m1cs6kQ8w31r2h5u7o1_500.gif\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/25.media.tumblr.com\/tumblr_m1cs6kQ8w31r2h5u7o1_500.gif\" width=\"320\" height=\"206\" border=\"0\" \/><\/a><\/span><\/div>\n<div style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;\"><a style=\"clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;\" href=\"http:\/\/1.bp.blogspot.com\/_scfe5YzN958\/S-4Q5Mr4U7I\/AAAAAAAAB8o\/0-EziXoMvQo\/s1600\/Miss+Foreign+Affairs.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/1.bp.blogspot.com\/_scfe5YzN958\/S-4Q5Mr4U7I\/AAAAAAAAB8o\/0-EziXoMvQo\/s320\/Miss+Foreign+Affairs.jpg\" width=\"320\" height=\"257\" border=\"0\" \/><\/a><\/span><\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;\">The Air Force personnel shown in the movie are either boringly competent functionaries (like the crew of the B-52), paranoid crazies, or both. \u00a0Scott&#8217;s characterization of Turgidson is a tour-de-force. \u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/rogerebert.suntimes.com\/apps\/pbcs.dll\/article?AID=\/19990711\/REVIEWS08\/907110301\/1023\">Famous critic Roger Ebert has praised the performance<\/a> as &#8220;the funniest thing in the movie, better even than the inspired triple performance by Peter Sellers or the nut-job general played by <a href=\"http:\/\/cdn2-b.examiner.com\/sites\/default\/files\/styles\/image_content_width\/hash\/b4\/52\/b452d0cfd89a4a633fcee4123c3adbfa.jpg\">Sterling Hayden<\/a>.&#8221; Ebert notes that he was especially impressed by the &#8220;tics and twitches, the grimaces and eybrow archings, the sardonic smiles and gum chewing&#8230;&#8221; \u00a0that help us understand the kind of man Gen. Turgidson is. \u00a0From the first moment we see him, in the midst of an evening tryst with his secretary (played by Tracy Reed, whose Playboy centerfold was being ogled by Major Kong during <i>his <\/i>\u00a0first appearance on screen) <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Id,_ego_and_super-ego#Id\">it is obvious that he is all id<\/a>, and that his lack of impulse control is a foreshadowing of his lack of control over the Air Force. \u00a0<\/span><\/div>\n<p><BR><\/p>\n<div style=\"text-align: justify;\"><\/div>\n<div style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;\">It is somewhat interesting that each of the Air Force officers featured in the movie are preoccupied with sex. \u00a0From the aptly named &#8220;Buck Turgidson&#8221;, to girlie-mag loving Maj. Kong who notes that with &#8220;&#8230;<span style=\"background-color: white;\"><span style=\"line-height: 18px;\">one issue of prophylactics; three lipsticks; three pair of nylon stockings. Shoot, a fella&#8217; could have a pretty good weekend in Vegas &#8230;&#8221; to the sexually impotent General Jack D. Ripper, who blames his failure to perform in bed to a &#8220;post-war Commie conspiracy&#8221; to weaken Americans&#8217; &#8220;essence&#8221; through\u00a0<\/span><span style=\"line-height: 18px;\">fluoridation<\/span><span style=\"line-height: 18px;\">\u00a0of the water supply. \u00a0The movie seems intent on pointing out the psycho-sexual import of the Air Force, especially considering the opening credits, which is about as explicit a sex scene as you could get in 1964:\u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/div>\n<p><iframe src=\"http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/YgoQ6U6GUoU\" width=\"560\" height=\"315\" frameborder=\"0\" allowfullscreen=\"allowfullscreen\"><\/iframe><\/p>\n<div style=\"text-align: center;\">\n<p><span style=\"font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;\">******************************************************************<\/span><\/p>\n<div style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;\">Mid-20th century technology plays a vital role in the movie, advancing the storyline inexorably until the world faces nuclear annihilation via computer (with, perhaps, a potential survival plan that also relies on computers to choose &#8220;survivors&#8221; based on, among other factors, &#8220;sexual fertility&#8221;). \u00a0But technologies like radar, jet aircraft, and the &#8220;Big Board&#8221; in the War Room are also important. \u00a0Watching the movie again recently surprised me that so many key moments of the movie involve a character talking into the phone! \u00a0Mandrake&#8217;s lack of a dime to call Washington and call back the bombers is funny as well as an historical anachronism that many young people (who carry phones in their pockets) might not appreciate. \u00a0My favorite is when the effete President Merkin Muffley (a &#8220;merkin&#8221; is a wig for the pubic region that actors wear during nude scenes) has to brief the drunk, womanizing Soviet Premier Kissoff. \u00a0This scene is \u00a0a clear take off on the then-current comic routines of Bob Newhart, whose stand-up comedy consisted of listening to one side of a phone call.<\/span><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p><iframe src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/EImgHuqQsuk?start=28\" width=\"560\" height=\"315\" frameborder=\"0\" allowfullscreen=\"allowfullscreen\"><\/iframe><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;\">Speaking of anachronisms, to young people watching the movie today, it may be hard to relate to the oppressive air of doom that hung over the world during the Cold War. \u00a0In his inaugural address, President Kennedy referred to the &#8220;uncertain balance of terror that stays the hand of mankind&#8217;s final war&#8221;. \u00a0Everyone was certain that a nuclear war between the U.S. and the U.S.S.R. was inevitable and that the deterrence which was based on the doctrine of Mutually Assured Destruction would ultimately fail. \u00a0Of course in the movie, it doesn&#8217;t so much fail, as get carried out to it&#8217;s most logical conclusion. \u00a0During the 1960&#8217;s, \u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/sites.google.com\/site\/calculatinghistory\/home\/doomsday\/animation-of-a-nuclear-bomb-effects-calculator\">soldiers<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/sites.google.com\/site\/calculatinghistory\/home\/doomsday\/animation-of-a-nuclear-bomb-effects-calculator\"> like my father were issued these &#8220;pocket computers&#8221; that would calculate the \u00a0yield and destructive force of a nuclear attack-<\/a>-they were also given out as part of the press kit for <i>Dr. Strangelove<\/i>. Young people were taught to take shelter under school desks or in doorways when a surprise attack occurred. And during the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.armscontrol.org\/act\/2011_05\/Thielmann\">1960 election, voters were warned of a growing &#8220;missile gap&#8221;<\/a>, where the Soviets were building significantly more nuclear missiles than the U.S. (in actuality, the American arsenal outnumbered the Soviets&#8217; by 17 to 1). \u00a01960&#8217;s era worries about &#8220;gaps&#8221; (like the missile gap, the generation gap and later the credibility gap) definitely informed the black humor of the final scene, when a desperate Gen. Turgidson berates President Muffley over a putative &#8220;mineshaft gap&#8221; 100 years in the future.<\/span><\/p>\n<div style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;\">******************************************************************<\/span><\/div>\n<div style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<p><span style=\"font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;\">I have incorporated many lines of dialogue from this movie into my daily life. \u00a0Some are merely references, such as when I speak the word &#8220;computer&#8221; in a Dr. Strangelove accent. \u00a0Or, referencing the scene where Gen. Ripper is shooting an M-60 at the Army assault team and he asks his British attache to give him ammunition; \u00a0when I am very hungry I will appropriate the line &#8220;Feed me, Mandrake&#8221;. \u00a0Then there are the quotes, such as when I got out of bed after <a href=\"http:\/\/icarusanybody.blogspot.com\/2012\/06\/back-and-badder-than-ever-after-long.html\">my recent back surgery<\/a>, and said &#8220;Mein Fuhrer! \u00a0I can walk!&#8221; \u00a0Similarly, I cannot drive in the direction of the Northeast Extension past Geisinger Hospital without hearing Slim Pickens&#8217; vow to &#8220;get them [bomb bay] doors open if it harelips everyone on <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Bear_Creek_Township,_Luzerne_County,_Pennsylvania\">Bear Creek<\/a>&#8220;. \u00a0 By all accounts, the screenplay (which is credited to Kubrick, <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Terry_Southern\">Terry Southern <\/a>and <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Peter_George_(author)\">Peter George<\/a> (who wrote <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Red_Alert_(novel)\">the book upon which the movie is based<\/a>) was augmented quite a bit by ad-libs from the actors. \u00a0Regardless of who is responsible for what, it is a very well written film.<\/span><\/p>\n<div style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;\">******************************************************************<\/span><\/div>\n<ul>\n<li><span style=\"font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;\">\u00a0My first question to you tonight is: did you find the movie funny? \u00a0If so, what parts, and why? \u00a0Or if not, why not?<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<ul>\n<li><span style=\"font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.visual-memory.co.uk\/amk\/doc\/0097.html\">Loudon Wainwright, the editor of\u00a0<i>Life\u00a0<\/i>\u00a0magazine wrote <\/a>:<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<blockquote><p><span style=\"font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;\">\u00a0<i>&#8220;I found myself at the edge of tears as I watched a series of nuclear explosions fill the screen, and heard a sweet female voice singing &#8216;We&#8217;ll meet again\/ don&#8217;t know where, don&#8217;t know when\/ but I know we&#8217;ll meet again some sunny day.&#8217;&#8230;Was I sad that the movie&#8217;s world was ending? \u00a0Was I having an attack of hysterics brought on by the film&#8217;s repeated and stunning outrages? \u00a0Or had I suddenly arrived after prolonged laughter at a glimpse of some awful truth?&#8221;\u00a0<\/i>\u00a0<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p><span style=\"font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;\">What do you think of the ending of the movie? \u00a0Is it sad? \u00a0Is it a &#8220;good&#8221; ending, or do you find it anti-climactic?<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<ul>\n<li><span style=\"font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;\">Next question: \u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.visual-memory.co.uk\/amk\/doc\/0029.html\">reaction to the movie in 1964 was often very critical<\/a>. \u00a0The <i>New York Times<\/i>\u00a0printed a letter to the editor saying &#8220;<i>Dr. Strangelove<\/i>\u00a0is straight propaganda, and dangerous propaganda at that. \u00a0It is an anti-American tract unmatched in invective by even our declared enemies.&#8221; \u00a0Another letter added that the film &#8220;indulges in the most insidious and highly dangerous form of public opinion tampering concerning a vital sector of our national life&#8230;which needs public funds, public understanding and public support to do its job.&#8221; \u00a0Even the official reviewer for the <i>Times <\/i>worried that the movie was &#8220;a bit too contemptuous of our defense establishment for my comfort and taste.&#8221; \u00a0Were these people right or wrong? \u00a0Was the movie &#8220;anti-American&#8221;? \u00a0Did it weaken the country&#8217;s defenses by showing incompetents and buffoons in high places? \u00a0Did it show a lack of respect toward the people in charge? \u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<ul>\n<li><span style=\"font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;\">The\u00a0<i>Washington Post&#8217;s<\/i>\u00a0review made a fascinating remark. \u00a0Writing on January 30, 1964, Robert Estabrook noted:<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<blockquote><p><span style=\"font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;\"><i>President Kennedy saw Dr. Strangelove shortly before his death, and it would be interesting to know his full reaction. \u00a0Perhaps Mr. Kubrick accomplishes his objective in getting people talking. \u00a0But it is worth asking what constructive purpose there is in\u00a0exaggerating\u00a0a complex problem so as to portray men who have served the free world well as a bunch of irrational simpletons<\/i>.<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;\">What do you think JFK would have thought about this, coming only a year or so after the Cuban Missile Crisis, and the disputes that led to the erection of the Berlin Wall? \u00a0And is it wrong to poke fun at people in positions of responsibility?<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><span style=\"font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;\">There is definitely a lot of exaggeration in the movie, from Dr. Strangelove&#8217;s mysterious disability, to Mandrake&#8217;s stiff upper lip. \u00a0But according to Kubrick in an article in the <i>Los Angeles Times<\/i>,\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<blockquote><p><span style=\"font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;\"><i>&#8220;I kept coming up with things and found myself saying I can&#8217;t do this, people will laugh at it. \u00a0But by being realistic&#8230;it shows that the leaders are just human beings subject to the same banalities and absurdities as the rest of us.\u00a0<\/i><\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p><span style=\"font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;\"><i>I found it good to nurture this to achieve what I call nightmare comedy. \u00a0This was the tone that fit the situation&#8211;the state of the world. \u00a0Very few of the laughs are jokes. \u00a0I think people laugh at a sudden sense&#8212;perhaps the truth&#8211;of what you might call the human equation. \u00a0<\/i><\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p><span style=\"font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;\"><i>It&#8217;s a brink of doom situation and they&#8217;re confronted with the same elements of everyday life. \u00a0You suddenly realize the folly of man&#8230;&#8221;<\/i>\u00a0<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;\">Do you think that Kubrick was serious about making a &#8220;realistic&#8221; movie?<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><span style=\"font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;\">Despite the negative reviews, the film set box office records when it came out, and it was nominated for Best Picture, Best Director, and Best Adapted Screenplay at the 1964 Academy Awards (Peter Sellers was also nominated for Best Actor). It is also listed in the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.filmsite.org.drst.html\/\">&#8220;Top 100 Films&#8221; by filmsite.org<\/a>. \u00a0 Do you think that the film deserved these nominations? \u00a0Is it a &#8220;great film&#8221;? \u00a0If so, why? \u00a0If not, why not?<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><span style=\"font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/docs.google.com\/viewer?a=v&amp;q=cache:cKMHEelzEa4J:www.nyu.edu\/cas\/ewp\/wakefielddark05.pdf+&amp;hl=en&amp;gl=us&amp;pid=bl&amp;srcid=ADGEESjrsSYbDcYnrRHokCk96dSJKo_6PmDn8Q9Rs9_JQCM63eXVOWra797BB62UHDxD4HI3og3wh7WiQhFgNCskxPVEhltv0LvNENCRwLSVS4IdD1ENJVRdoqd8T5EAo13qTLPswWqg&amp;sig=AHIEtbRQKjC9mvI5T1EXaBfanlett8Cx5w&amp;pli=1\">Another scholar \u00a0has written about the music in the movie<\/a>. \u00a0 Caran Wakefield writes:<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<blockquote><p><span style=\"font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;\"><i>When the crew receives the fatal plan of attack, the traditional battle hymn &#8220;When Johnny Comes Marching Home&#8221; rings majestically in the background as homage to the misguided soldiers. \u00a0This sonorous brass fanfare provides the only background music in the entire film, highlighting the heroic qualities of courage and loyalty that the crew demonstrates&#8230;[t]he music absolves these characters&#8230;Kubrick presents them not as culprits but as victims of an irony beyond their ability to comprehend<\/i>.<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;\">Pretty deep stuff. \u00a0What do you think? \u00a0Was the air crew heroic? \u00a0Or were they to blame for the destruction they (unwittingly, thanks to the Doomsday device) unleashed?<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><span style=\"font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;\">One thing that many observers point out about the movie is the sexual connotations of character&#8217;s names. \u00a0According to our friends at <a href=\"http:\/\/filmsite.org\/\">filmsite.org<\/a>, this includes the following:<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<table style=\"color: black; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; text-align: center !important; width: 68%px;\" border=\"1\" cellspacing=\"0\" cellpadding=\"2\" align=\"center\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"text-align: left;\" width=\"30%\"><center><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;\"><b>Character Name<\/b><\/span><\/center><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: left;\" width=\"46%\"><center><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;\"><b>Sexual Connotation or Reference<\/b><\/span><\/center><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: left;\" width=\"24%\"><center><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;\"><b>Actor<\/b><\/span><\/center><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"text-align: left;\" width=\"30%\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;\">Jack D. Ripper<\/span><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: left;\" width=\"46%\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;\">a notorious English psychopathic killer of prostitutes, or a killer in general<\/span><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: left;\" width=\"24%\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;\">Sterling Hayden<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"text-align: left;\" width=\"30%\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;\">Mandrake<\/span><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: left;\" width=\"46%\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;\">a medicinal plant root or herb, said to encourage fertility, conception or potency &#8211; an aphrodisiac<\/span><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: left;\" width=\"24%\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;\">Peter Sellers<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"text-align: left;\" width=\"30%\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;\">Buck Turgidson<\/span><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: left;\" width=\"46%\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;\">a &#8220;buck&#8221; is a male animal or stud; &#8220;turgid&#8221; means distended or swollen; and his delayed love-making to a real-life\u00a0<i>Playboy<\/i>\u00a0centerfold Tracy Reed &#8211; the<i>only<\/i>\u00a0woman in the entire film<\/span><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: left;\" width=\"24%\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;\">George C. Scott<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"text-align: left;\" width=\"30%\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;\">Merkin Muffley<\/span><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: left;\" width=\"46%\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;\">merkin = slang for female pubic area or pudendum; muff = a woman&#8217;s pubic area or genitalia, or specifically, the pubic hair\/fur\/wig for the female crotch<\/span><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: left;\" width=\"24%\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;\">Peter Sellers<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"text-align: left;\" width=\"30%\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;\">Col. &#8216;Bat&#8217; Guano<\/span><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: left;\" width=\"46%\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;\">bat excrement<\/span><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: left;\" width=\"24%\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;\">Keenan Wynn<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"text-align: left;\" width=\"30%\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;\">Soviet premier Dmitri Kissof<\/span><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: left;\" width=\"46%\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;\">&#8220;kiss-off&#8221;, literally means &#8216;start of disaster&#8217;, or to dump or scorn<\/span><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: left;\" width=\"24%\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;\">Voice only<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"text-align: left;\" width=\"30%\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;\">Ambassador Desadeski<\/span><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: left;\" width=\"46%\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;\">named after the Marquis de Sade &#8211; an infamous and perverted sexual lover and sadist in the 18th century (sade-ism)<\/span><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: left;\" width=\"24%\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;\">Peter Bull<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"text-align: left;\" width=\"30%\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;\">Maj. T.J. &#8220;King&#8221; Kong<\/span><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: left;\" width=\"46%\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;\">signifying a male beast with a primitive, destructive, obsessive lust<\/span><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: left;\" width=\"24%\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;\">Slim Pickens<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"text-align: left;\" width=\"30%\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;\">Dr. Strange-love<\/span><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: left;\" width=\"46%\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;\">perverted love<\/span><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: left;\" width=\"24%\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;\">Peter Sellers<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"text-align: left;\" width=\"30%\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;\">The bombs<\/span><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: left;\" width=\"46%\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;\">Inscribed with &#8220;Dear John&#8221; and &#8220;Hi There&#8221;<\/span><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: left;\" width=\"24%\"><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;\">Do you think that these names were chosen consciously to make a point, or do you think it was just the writers horsing around?<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"text-align: start;\"><span style=\"font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;\">In a <a href=\"http:\/\/tonymacklin.net\/content.php?cID=167\">review of the film from 1965<\/a>, Tony Macklin stated that &#8220;<i>Dr. Strangelove<\/i>\u00a0is a sex allegory: from foreplay to explosion in the mechanized world.&#8221; \u00a0He lists examples ranging from Gen. Ripper&#8217;s &#8220;phallic&#8221; cigar and machine gun to the &#8220;womb-like&#8221; War Room, to the &#8220;mechanized&#8221; Dr. Strangelove, &#8220;whose name captures the essence of the film&#8221;. \u00a0He closes the review by writing:<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<blockquote><p><span style=\"font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;\"><i>The film concludes with a panorama of beautiful mushroom clouds destroying the world, as Vera Lynn sweetly sings &#8216;We&#8217;ll Meet Again&#8217;. \u00a0Impotence is no more. \u00a0Warped sex has been erased. \u00a0Civilization can go back to its beginnings. \u00a0Dr. Strangelove&#8230;ends in an orgiastic purgation. \u00a0Kauffmann says &#8216;This film says &#8230;the real Doomsday Machine is men&#8217;. \u00a0Actually, the real Doomsday Machine is sex. \u00a0As King Kong, Buck Turgidson, and Dr. Strangelove himself would chorus, &#8216;What a Way to Go!&#8217; \u00a0Love that bomb.<\/i><\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;\">Do you agree that the the film is an allegory? If so, why? \u00a0If not, why not?<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><span style=\"font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;\">The director of photography (cinematographer) for the movie was <a href=\"http:\/\/www.imdb.com\/name\/nm0852405\/\">Gilbert Taylor<\/a>, who among other films also shot <i>Star Wars, The Omen, <\/i>and several episodes of <i>The Avengers.<\/i>\u00a0 But most intriguing to me is that he also shot the Beatles&#8217; first film, <i>A Hard Days&#8217; Night<\/i>, which has several things in common with this movie (shot in England, in black and white, directed by an American, with lots of ad libbed dialogue). \u00a0When I learned this connection it instantly clicked. \u00a0I encourage you to watch <i>AHDN<\/i>\u00a0and see how similar the &#8220;look&#8221; of the film is&#8211;there is definitely a &#8220;Gilbert Taylor touch&#8221; at work.\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<ul>\n<li><span style=\"font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.visual-memory.co.uk\/amk\/doc\/0029.html\">Susan Sontag reviewed the movie upon its release<\/a> and wrote that &#8220;intellectuals and adolescents both love it. But the 16-year olds who are lining up to see it understand the film and its real virtues, better than the intellectuals, who vastly overpraise it.&#8221; Jeremy Boxen, in &#8220;Just What The Doctor Ordered: Cold War Purging, Political Dissent and the Right Hand of Dr. Strangelove&#8221;, \u00a0goes on to write:<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<blockquote><p><span style=\"font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;\"><i>In the later part of the decade, these 16-year olds would become the university students who dominated the movement of political protest and counter-culture lifestyle that resulted in the large, anti-war demonstrations in New York, Chicago and Washington. \u00a0500,000 of these young adults would turn up at the Woodstock concert in 1969, which was as much of a defining event of the late 1960&#8217;s as the Vietnam protest in Washington, occurring a few months later in the same year and drawing the same number of people. As much as any film can claim to influence a society, &#8216;Dr. Strangelove&#8217; helped to fuel a generation of dissent.<\/i><\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><span style=\"color: #505050; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;\">Do you think this is true? \u00a0Was this film&#8217;s jaundiced look at authority and America&#8217;s armed forces \u00a0a catalyst for the youth movement of the 1960&#8217;s?<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"text-align: justify;\"><\/div>\n<p>Views: 552<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>On Thursday, October 4, 2012 I was the guest speaker at the kickoff to a film discussion series hosted by Penn State Wilkes-Barre at Movies 14 in Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania. \u00a0The overall theme of the series is movies that have to do with the end of the world. \u00a0The first film chosen was Stanley Kubrick&#8216;s Dr. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":512,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[282,279,280,283,281],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-44","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-dr-strangelove","category-film","category-george-c-scott","category-penn-state","category-stanley-kubrick"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.ethanlewis.org\/icarus\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/44","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.ethanlewis.org\/icarus\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.ethanlewis.org\/icarus\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.ethanlewis.org\/icarus\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.ethanlewis.org\/icarus\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=44"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"http:\/\/www.ethanlewis.org\/icarus\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/44\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":513,"href":"http:\/\/www.ethanlewis.org\/icarus\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/44\/revisions\/513"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.ethanlewis.org\/icarus\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/512"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.ethanlewis.org\/icarus\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=44"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.ethanlewis.org\/icarus\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=44"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.ethanlewis.org\/icarus\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=44"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}